Movie Review: Exorcist III (1990)
Synopsis
"Exorcist III", directed by William Peter Blatty, is a chilling sequel to the iconic horror film "The Exorcist". Set fifteen years after the traumatic events that took place in Georgetown, the film dives into the psyche of its protagonist, Lieutenant Kinderman (George C. Scott), as he tackles a series of grisly murders that bear a striking resemblance to a series of crimes committed years prior.
The film opens in the 1980s as Kinderman, now a weary detective, grapples with the loss of his friend Father Karras, who died during the exorcism of the young Regan MacNeil. Kinderman’s recent string of investigations leads him to a psychiatric hospital where he learns of a profoundly unsettling case. Patients have been killed in an almost ritualistic manner, and their deaths display a disturbing connection to the possessed Regan’s ordeal.
As the narrative unfolds, Kinderman encounters a man named Patient X (Brad Dourif), who may hold the key to this horrifying mystery. Patient X is not only remarkably aware of the nature of the murders but also embodies a sinister presence reminiscent of the demonic spirit that once possessed Regan. Throughout the film, Kinderman’s quest intertwines with themes of faith, guilt, and the essence of evil, leading him toward a confrontation with the supernatural that will test his scepticism and resolve.
Main Cast
- George C. Scott as Lieutenant William "Bill" Kinderman
- Brad Dourif as Patient X / The Gemini Killer
- Ed Flanders as Father Dyer
- Nancy Fish as Nurse
- Scott Wilson as The Gemini Killer’s Associate
- Vasiliki Maliaros as Mrs. Aimens
- Clive Revill as Dr. Tanney
Review
"Exorcist III" stands as a unique entry in the horror genre, largely due to its detached approach to conventional scares. Rather than relying on overt shocks or grotesque imagery, Blatty opts for a more psychological form of tension, creating a film embedded deep within the mind’s darker recesses. At its core, the film challenges the line between sanity and madness, a theme that resonates not only within the context of horror but also speaks broadly to human experience.
This third instalment is driven by extraordinary performances, chiefly from George C. Scott, whose portrayal of Kinderman anchors the narrative. Scott embodies the weariness of a man who has witnessed and fought against unspeakable evil. His performance is both charismatic and deeply human, allowing the audience to feel his conflict as he grapples with the existence of evil amid a world that seems increasingly indifferent to it.
Brad Dourif, in his role as Patient X, delivers a performance that is nothing short of riveting. His ability to oscillate between the charming and the malevolent reinforces the uncertainty of his character’s nature and adds depth to the film’s exploration of good and evil. Dourif’s monologues, particularly those depicting the Gemini Killer’s philosophies on death and violence, imbue the film with a philosophical gravitas that invites deeper contemplation.
The film’s screenplay, penned by Blatty himself, deftly navigates the territory between horror and introspective dialogue. The script is peppered with poignant observations on faith, loss, and the nature of evil. There are moments in the film, particularly the dialogues shared between Kinderman and Father Dyer, that rise above standard horror fare, elevating the narrative into a metaphysical examination of despair and hope.
Visually, "Exorcist III" distinguishes itself with a more subdued aesthetic than its predecessors. While it lacks the iconic, startling imagery of the first film, Blatty captures the bleak atmosphere of a hospital corridor and the unnerving silence of a mental institution. Furthermore, the cinematography, courtesy of MVP cinematographer Dick Bush, crafts an effective integration of lighting and shadow that heightens the film’s eerie undertone—evoking the sensation of dread lurking just beneath the surface.
One of the most unforgettable sequences occurs in a moment of shocking intensity when a nurse, unsuspecting of the evil that looms in the darkened hallways of the institution, meets a horrific fate. This pivotal scene reflects not only the horror of the supernatural but also the vulnerability of those who seek to help others. It serves as a reminder that even the most ordinary settings can conceal an omnipresent malevolence.
The pacing of "Exorcist III" can be contentious, as it often dips into extended dialogues and moments of introspection that could be perceived as languorous by some audiences. However, it is during these moments that Blatty’s exploration of existential themes takes precedence, allowing the audience to engage with the film on a more philosophical level.
The sound design plays an important role as well, with a score that veers between haunting melodies and jarring tones, punctuating moments of tension. The eeriness of the silence contrasted with sudden bursts of sound creates an unsettling atmosphere that lingers long after the film concludes.
Regrettably, "Exorcist III" isn’t entirely free from flaws. Certain elements of exposition at times feel overly contrived, and the resolution may not resonate with those seeking traditional "horror" outcomes. The third act may also offer a less satisfying final confrontation for some, diverging from the expectations set up by its predecessor. Nevertheless, it remains consistent with Blatty’s vision and commitment to exploring weightier themes rather than succumbing to genre clichés.
In terms of overall impact, "Exorcist III" departs from its predecessors by merging horror with philosophy, offering not only frights but also reflections on faith, despair, and the human condition. It is a film that urges viewers to contemplate about the nature of evil—whether it is a supernatural force or an intrinsic part of ourselves.
Conclusion
"Exorcist III" is a thoughtful, multifaceted horror film that challenges the viewer to look deeper into concepts of faith, morality, and the essence of evil. George C. Scott and Brad Dourif deliver performances that are mesmerizing, supported by Blatty’s deft screenplay and vision. Those who embrace the film’s slower pacing and philosophical undertones will find a complex narrative that rewards further thought.
Despite its artificial pacing and a third act that may leave some wishing for more, the film’s unique strengths shine brightly. As a sequel to the original, it carves its identity within the horror genre, offering a chilling experience both visceral and intellectual. This film has solidified its place within the pantheon of horror movies—elevated by remarkable performances and a poignant exploration of humanity’s darkest depths.
Score: 7.5/10
